Re: Last gasp
От | Jay Levitt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Last gasp |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4F8C86D9.4060008@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Last gasp (Alex <ash@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Last gasp
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alex wrote: > Jay Levitt<jay.levitt@gmail.com> writes: > >> Alex wrote: >>> I didn't follow this whole thread, but have we considered Redmine[1]? >> As the resident "Ruby is shiny, let's do everything in Rails on my >> MacBook" guy, I'd like to make a statement against interest: I've >> tried Redmine a few times and it's been painful. Much of the codebase >> is deprecated, it's slow, it has no meaningful search (in 2012?!), >> I've seen wiki edits disappear, and at the moment pulling up its own >> FAQ page at redmine.org times out. > > Yay, that's totally FUD to me. You're right, it was. My bad. Someday I will find the balance between precision and concision. > Could you please elaborate a bit on your points? > > Deprecated codebase? Let me guess... > > It runs on an outdated version of Rails (2.3) but only because Rails is > changing so rapidly, I believe. There is work in progress[1] to move to > the supported branch Rails-3.x. I wasn't even thinking of that; I know many production systems still run on Rails 2.3, and in fact it probably even performs better for some workloads. 3.x is a mixed bag. I don't hold that against Redmine. But it's still FUD, because I can't remember where I saw this information. So: withdrawn. > > Slow? Do you have any data to back this point up? No measurable data; just a sigh of relief when switching from Redmine to Github - and GitHub ain't a speed demon. In general, I've seen multi-second page load times on crazy-simple things like wiki edits; this was on a hosted provider (sourcerepo.com), but they also hosted our git repo and we had no speed problems there. > No meaningful search, eh? Works for me. Redmine searches return partial-word matches, and there's no way to disable that. Searching for "test" finds "latest". To me, that's broken. Also, the UI is very 5 years ago; e.g., "compare revisions" uses the same columns-of-radio-buttons approach as MediaWiki. If the goal is a tool to reduce friction and increase involvement, you want a smoother UX. Jay
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: