Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
От | Boszormenyi Zoltan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4F8450C7.7000707@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2012-04-10 16:55 keltezéssel, Michael Meskes írta: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:37:22AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote: >>> Only a non-decorated cursor can be overridden, even if >>> a different default readahead window size is specified with >>> e.g. "ecpg -R 8". If ECPGFETCHSZ is not present, 8 will be used, >>> if ECPGFETCHSZ is present, its value will be used. ECPGopen() >>> will need an extra bool argument to distinguish this. >>> >>> Is this acceptable? Noah, Michael? >> Sounds perfect. > Fine by me. > > Michael OK. Next question: now that both patches are intended to be applied, should I send a unified single patch that contains the previous functionality and the required fixes or a new one that only contains the last required fixes? Thanks in advance, Zoltán Böszörményi -- ---------------------------------- Zoltán Böszörményi Cybertec Schönig& Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de http://www.postgresql.at/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: