Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4F798ED5.1090602@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 04/01/2012 09:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > On 04/01/2012 08:29 PM, Claudio Freire wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> >> wrote: >>>> You could try using Unix domain socket and see if the performance >>>> improves. A relevant link: >>> >>> He said Windows. There are no Unix domain sockets on Windows. (And >>> please >>> don't top-post) >> Windows supports named pipes, which are functionally similar, but I >> don't think pg supports them. >> > > Correct, so telling the OP to have a look at them isn't at all > helpful. And they are not supported on all Windows platforms we > support either (specifically not on XP, AIUI). > > Apparently I was mistaken about the availability. However, my initial point remains. Since all our client/server comms on Windows are over TCP, telling the OP to look at Unix domain sockets is unhelpful. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: