Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4F5A5139.1020701@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/09/2012 01:40 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:02 PM, David E. Wheeler<david@justatheory.com> wrote: >> On Mar 9, 2012, at 7:55 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote: >>> 100% agree (having re-read the thread and Alvaro's idea having sunk >>> in). Being able to set up daemon processes side by side with the >>> postmaster would fit the bill nicely. It's pretty interesting to >>> think of all the places you could go with it. >> pgAgent could use it *right now*. I keep forgetting to restart it after restarting PostgreSQL and finding after a dayor so that no jobs have run. > That can and should be fixed by teaching pgAgent that failing to > connect to the server, or getting disconnected, is not a fatal error, > but a reason to sleep and retry. Yeah. It's still not entirely clear to me what a postmaster-controlled daemon is going to be able to do that an external daemon can't. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: