Re: regress bug
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: regress bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4F59286B.1090406@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: regress bug ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: regress bug
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/08/2012 04:33 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Mar 8, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Huh? MODULE_PATHNAME is not substituted by pg_regress at all (anymore >> anyway). > Yeah, sorry, I meant `make`. > >> There's still some vestigial support for it in pgxs.mk, but >> the future of that code is to vanish, not get improved. You should >> not be needing it to get substituted at build time either. > I still see this pattern a *lot*; I removed it from PL/Proxy last week. The attached tarball demonstrates it: > > > make > sed 's,MODULE_PATHNAME,$libdir/sql/exttest,g' sql/exttest.sql.in>sql/exttest.sql > make: *** No rule to make target `exttest.so', needed by `all'. Stop. > > So MODULE_PATHNAME is replaced with $libdir/sql/exttest rather than $libdir/exttest. Maybe that should not be fixed, butthere are a *lot* of extensions out there using this approach (copied from contrib, which used it for years, albeit withoutthe .sql.in files in a subdirectory). > > So perhaps DATA_built is to be removed from pgxs.mk? And if so, is the idea then that one should just put the module namein the .sql file, rather than MODULE_PATHNAME in a .sql.in file? > Extensions (unlike non-extension modules) should not monkey with MODULE_PATHNAME at all. Change the Makefile def from DATA_built to DATA and rename the file to exttest.sql cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: