On 02/28/2012 09:50 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>
> Sigh. I will have to think on this before changing anything.
>
> To my mind, the most straight-forward way of dealing with
> this is to remove the language from template1 altogether.
> Thereafter, the db owner must explicitly add it back in
> where required. So, the default would be no extension.
Well that is how it was prior to 9.0.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@gmail.com