(2012/02/25 7:31), Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Could we name this "postgresql_fdw" instead? We already have several
> ${productname}_fdw out there, and I don't want to get in the business of
> having to guess variant spellings.
I worry name conflict with existing postgresql_fdw_validator, which is
implemented in backend binary and used by contrib/dblink. I thought
that we should use another name for PostgreSQL FDW unless we can change
specification of dblink connection string.
--
Shigeru Hanada