Re: Very long deletion time on a 200 GB database
От | Shaun Thomas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Very long deletion time on a 200 GB database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4F4B9AB9.6000900@peak6.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Very long deletion time on a 200 GB database (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Very long deletion time on a 200 GB database
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 02/27/2012 08:53 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > If he has autovacuum on he could well be just fine with his proposed > strategy. Or he could have tables partitioned by time and do the delete > by just dropping partitions. There are numerous way he could get this to > work. He isn't using partitions though. That's the whole reason for this thread. Having autovacuum turned on (which should be the case for 8.4 and above anyway) will not magically remove the old rows. VACUUM marks rows as dead/reusable, so INSERT and UPDATE statements will take the dead spots instead of creating new extents. Like I said, this will stop his tables from growing further so long as he keeps his maintenance functions running regularly from now on, but the existing rows he's trying to delete will never go away until he runs a CLUSTER or some other system of actually purging the dead rows. Notice how I don't suggest using VACUUM FULL. :) -- Shaun Thomas OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604 312-444-8534 sthomas@peak6.com ______________________________________________ See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: