Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4F437F25.6050805@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
(2012/02/15 20:50), Etsuro Fujita wrote: > (2012/02/14 23:50), Tom Lane wrote: >>> (2012/02/14 17:40), Etsuro Fujita wrote: >>>> As discussed at >>>> that thread, it would have to change the PlanForeignScan API to let the >>>> FDW generate multiple paths and dump them all to add_path instead of >>>> returning a FdwPlan struct. >> I would really like to see that happen in 9.2, because the longer we let >> that mistake live, the harder it will be to change. More and more FDWs >> are getting written. I don't think it's that hard to do: we just have >> to agree that PlanForeignScan should return void and call add_path for >> itself, possibly more than once. > > Agreed. I fixed the PlanForeignScan API. Please find attached a patch. > >> If we do that, I'm inclined to think >> we cou;d get rid of the separate Node type FdwPlan, and just incorporate >> "List *fdw_private" into ForeignPath and ForeignScan. > > +1 While the patch retains the struct FdwPlan, I would like to get rid > of it at next version of the patch. Please find attached an updated version of the patch. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: