Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Smith
Тема Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results
Дата
Msg-id 4F41C975.3010700@2ndQuadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 02/19/2012 05:37 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Please retest with wal_buffers 128MB, checkpoint_segments 1024

The test parameters I'm using aim to run through several checkpoint 
cycles in 10 minutes of time.  Bumping up against the ugly edges of 
resource bottlenecks is part of the test.  Increasing 
checkpoint_segments like that would lead to time driven checkpoints, 
either 1 or 2 of them during 10 minutes.  I'd have to increase the total 
testing time by at least 5X to get an equal workout of the system.  That 
would be an interesting data point to collect if I had a few weeks to 
focus just on that test.  I think that's more than pgbench testing 
deserves though.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results
Следующее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: wal_buffers