Re: When do we lose column names?
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: When do we lose column names? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4F3B3827.7040803@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: When do we lose column names? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/14/2012 05:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > OK, I fixed this up and committed it. I made some cosmetic changes > (the most notable being that the definition of RowExpr is really > changing here, and so should its comment). The adjust_appendrel_attrs > situation was fixed by passing in the PlannerInfo, which is something > that probably should have been made available all along --- there are > very few nontrivial functions in the planner that don't need it. Great, many thanks for finishing this up. > > I'm still a bit annoyed by the behavior I mentioned here, > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-11/msg01031.php > that we don't get "real" column names from an unflattened VALUES RTE. > Might be worth looking into that, but I don't have time for it. > > A TODO maybe? cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: