Re: auto_explain produces invalid JSON
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: auto_explain produces invalid JSON |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4F394B96.808@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: auto_explain produces invalid JSON (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: auto_explain produces invalid JSON
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/13/2012 11:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > [ sorry for ignoring this over the weekend --- I wasn't feeling very well ] > > Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 02/11/2012 03:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I'm inclined to think that this is auto_explain's error, not that of >>> the core code, ie we should be changing the output. >> Well, maybe this is more to your taste, although it strikes me as more >> than something of a kludge. At least it's short :-) > I see you've already committed this, but I agree that it's quite a > kluge. > > After looking a bit more at the existing explain code, it seems like the > critical issue is that explain.c has ExplainOpenGroup/ExplainCloseGroup > calls around the ExplainPrintPlan call (see ExplainOnePlan), while > auto_explain does not. I did not like your originally proposed patch > because it seemed to introduce yet another formatting concept into code > that has already got a few too many. But couldn't we fix this by > exporting ExplainOpenGroup/ExplainCloseGroup and then calling those from > auto_explain? Yeah, maybe. We'd still have to do it conditionally (have to use ExplainBeginOutput for the XML case), but it would possibly be less kludgy. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: