Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time
От | Jim \"Decibel!\" Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4F304BD9.3040409@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation
time
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/6/12 3:19 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > While we're waiting for anyone else to weigh in with an opinion on the >> > right place to draw the line here, do you want to post an updated >> > patch with the changes previously discussed? > Well, I think we have to ask not only how many people are using > float4/8, but how many people are sorting or creating indexes on them. > I think it would be few and perhaps should be eliminated. I agree that it's probably pretty unusual to index floats. My objection was on the assumption that float8 is valid but float4 isn't. If we are going to provide a fast-path for one then we should do it for both if for no other reason than least surprise. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Architectjim@nasby.net 512.569.9461 (cell)http://jim.nasby.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: