Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Дата
Msg-id 4F2FA541.8040300@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 06.02.2012 10:05, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>  wrote:
>> On 06.02.2012 05:48, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks.  Clearly we don't need 16 bits to represent our page version
>>> number because we rarely change it. The other good thing is I don't
>>> remember anyone wanting additional per-page storage in the past few
>>> years except for a checksum.
>>
>> There's this idea that I'd like to see implemented:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01176.php
>
> As you'll note, adding that field will change the page format and is
> therefore ruled out for 9.2.
>
> ISTM there is a different way to handle that anyway. All we need to do
> is to record the LSN of the last wraparound in shared memory/control
> file. Any block with page LSN older than that has all-frozen rows.
> That doesn't use any space nor does it require another field to be
> set.

Good idea. However, the followup idea to that discussion was to not only 
avoid the I/O needed to mark tuples as frozen, but to avoid xid 
wraparound altogether, by allowing clog to grow indefinitely. You do 
want to freeze at some point of course, to truncate the clog, but it 
would be nice to not have a hard limit. The way to do that is to store 
an xid "epoch" in the page header, so that Xids are effectively 64-bits 
wide, even though the xid fields on the tuple header are only 32-bits 
wide. That does require a new field in the page header.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Report: race conditions in WAL replay routines
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2