Re: Planet posting policy
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Planet posting policy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4F259C4D.5050806@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Planet posting policy (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Planet posting policy
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Dave, I think a list of what's prohibited would be simpler: ================== The purpose of Planet PostgreSQL is to provide useful news, ideas, technical information, and community discussion for members of the PostgreSQL community. It is not a medium for advertising commercial products and services; the community has other channels for that. Therefore, the following kinds of content are prohibited from Planet PostgreSQL, and may cause your blog to be removed from syndication if you post them: * Posts whose primary purpose is to advertise a commercial product, service, website, or event and lack substantial technical information or news of community interest; * Multiple and frequent posts which center around the same commercial product, service, event, or website with significant advertising content. Since the above evaluations are qualitative, here's some examples: BAD: Post announcing the launch of your new PostGIS-based website, without any real mention of PostGIS. GOOD: Post announcing the launch of your new PostGIS-based website, with a couple sentences about how it's based on PostGIS. BAD: 5 posts in a row about the new PostGIS website, all of which lack siginificant technical content. GOOD: Post about your commercial Postgres fork, how it differs from mainstream PostgreSQL, and why you'd want to use it. GOOD: Post about the technical challenges you overcame when developing your commercial Postgres fork. BAD: Post announcing the availability of version 3.5.641 of your commercial Postgres fork, with details copied directly from the press release. ============================== -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: