Re: Setting -Werror in CFLAGS
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Setting -Werror in CFLAGS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4F04AA10.2070800@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Setting -Werror in CFLAGS (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Setting -Werror in CFLAGS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04.01.2012 20:44, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Peter Geoghegan<peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>>> Yes, I know that these only appeared in GCC 4.6+ and as such are a >>>> relatively recent phenomenon, but there has been some effort to >>>> eliminate them, and if I could get a non-hacked -Werror build I'd feel >>>> happy enough about excluding them as already outlined. >> >>> I just do this: >>> echo COPT=-Werror> src/Makefile.custom >>> ...which seems to work reasonably well. >> >> I see no point in -Werror whatsoever. If you aren't examining the make >> output for warnings, you're not following proper development practice >> IMO. > > I find -Werror to be a convenient way to examine the output for > warnings. Otherwise they scroll off the screen. Yeah, I could save > the output to a file and grep it afterwards, but that seems less > convenient. I'm clearly not the only one doing it this way, since > src/backend/parser/gram.o manually sticks in -Wno-error... I use "make -s". -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: