Re: patch for type privileges
От | Yeb Havinga |
---|---|
Тема | Re: patch for type privileges |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4EE795AF.7050905@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: patch for type privileges (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: patch for type privileges
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2011-12-12 20:53, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On sön, 2011-12-11 at 21:21 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> * Cannot restrict access to array types. After revoking usage from the >>> element type, the error is perhaps a bit misleading. (smallint[] vs >>> smallint) >>> >>> postgres=> create table a (a int2[]); >>> ERROR: permission denied for type smallint[] >> OK, that error message should be improved. > Fixing this is easy, but I'd like to look into refactoring this a bit. > Let's ignore that for now; it's easy to do later. My experience with ignoring things for now is not positive. >>> * The information schema view 'attributes' has this additional condition: >>> AND (pg_has_role(t.typowner, 'USAGE') >>> OR has_type_privilege(t.oid, 'USAGE')); >>> >>> What happens is that attributes in a composite type are shown, or not, >>> if the current user has USAGE rights. The strange thing here, is that >>> the attribute in the type being show or not, doesn't match being able to >>> use it (in the creation of e.g. a table). >> Yeah, that's a bug. That should be something like >> >> AND (pg_has_role(c.relowner, 'USAGE') >> OR has_type_privilege(c.reltype, 'USAGE')); > And fix for that included. Confirmed that this now works as expected. I have no remarks on the other parts of the patch code. After puzzling a bit more with the udt and usage privileges views, it is clear that they should complement each other. That might be reflected by adding to the 'usage_privileges' section a link back to the 'udt_privileges' section. I have no further comments on this patch. regards, Yeb Havinga
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: