Re: JSON for PG 9.2
| От | Greg Smith |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: JSON for PG 9.2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4EE75D28.5030603@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: JSON for PG 9.2 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Re: JSON for PG 9.2 Re: JSON for PG 9.2 |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/13/2011 08:44 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > Rather, I think the point is that embedded Javascript is *extremely* > popular, lots and > lots of people are supporting it, and we ought to seriously consider > doing the same. It's hard to think of another PL that we could add > that would give us anywhere near the bang for the buck that Javascript > would. > Quite. I hate Javascript with a passion, wish it would just go away and stop meddling with my life. And even with that context, I think in-core PL/V8 would be a huge advocacy win. PostgreSQL has this great developer-oriented PL interface, it just doesn't work out of the box with any of the "pop" languages right now. Personal story on this. When my book came out, I was trying to take the #1 spot on Packt's bestseller list, even if it was just for a day. Never made it higher than #2. The #1 spot the whole time was "jQuery 1.4 Reference Guide", discussing the most popular JavaScript library out there. And you know what? Over a year later, it's *still there*. At no point did it over drop out of that top spot. The number of people who would consider server-side programming suddenly feasible if PL/V8 were easy to do is orders of magnitude larger than the current PostgreSQL community. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: