Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE
От | ben hockey |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4EDE7A64.80209@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE
Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/6/2011 3:20 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > I am for ECMA datestyle > > it is there but just is not public, if I remember well > > Theoretically some custom output/input transform routine can be very > interesting - for domains, for boolean type - but on second hand - the > usage of this feature is minimal and there is risk for less advanced > users - so ECMA datestyle is very adequate solution. > > Regards > > Pavel > i don't particularly need anything other than ECMA datestyle - i was just under the impression that a more generic solution was preferred. so, ECMA is enough to stop me from making any more noise about this. pavel, is there a way i can use this currently? if not, would it take much effort to make this public? thanks, ben...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: