Re: testing ProcArrayLock patches
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: testing ProcArrayLock patches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4EC668A10200002500043257@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: testing ProcArrayLock patches (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: testing ProcArrayLock patches
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > When doing line-level profiles I would suggest looking at the > instructions. What's the best way to do that? > I don't think cache line contention is the most likely candidate > here. Simple cache-misses seem far more likely. In combination > with pipeline stalls... > > Newer cpus (nehalem+) can measure stalled cycles which can be > really useful when analyzing performance. I don't remember how to > do that with oprofile right now though as I use perf these days > (its -e stalled-cycles{frontend|backend} there}). When I run oprofile, I still always go back to this post by Tom: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-06/msg00154.php Can anyone provide such a "cheat sheet" for perf? I could give that a try if I knew how. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: