Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring

On 2011-11-16 15:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com>  writes:
>> Not sure about the log line, but allowing pgstattuple to distinguish
>> between recently-dead and quite-thoroughly-dead seems useful.
> The dividing line is enormously unstable though.  pgstattuple's idea of
> RecentGlobalXmin could even be significantly different from that of a
> concurrently running VACUUM.  I can see the point of having VACUUM log
> what it did, but opinions from the peanut gallery aren't worth much.

I don't understand your the last remark so I want to get it clear: I 
looked up peanut gallery on the wiki. Is 'opinion from the peanut 
gallery' meant to describe my comments as patch reviewer? I'd appreciate 
brutal honesty on this point.

thanks
Yeb