Re: Using incrond for archiving
От | Shaun Thomas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using incrond for archiving |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4EC1892F.2050506@peak6.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Using incrond for archiving (Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Using incrond for archiving
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 11/11/2011 04:21 PM, Shaun Thomas wrote: > So my real question: is this safe? So to answer my own question: no, it's not safe. The PG backends apparently write to the xlog files periodically and *close* them after doing so. There's no open filehandle that gets written until the file is full and switched to the next one. Knowing that, I used pg_xlogfile_name(pg_current_xlog_location()) to get the most recent xlog file, and wrote a small script incrond would launch. In the script, it gets the current xlog, and will refuse to copy that one. What I don't quite understand is that after calling pg_xlog_switch(), it will sometimes still write to an old xlog several minutes later. Here's an example (0069 is the current xlog): 2011-11-14 15:05:01 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current 2011-11-14 15:05:06 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current 2011-11-14 15:05:20 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current 2011-11-14 15:06:01 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current 2011-11-14 15:06:06 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current 2011-11-14 15:06:06 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current 2011-11-14 15:06:37 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current 2011-11-14 15:06:58 : 0000000200000ED500000045 : xlog : copying 2011-11-14 15:07:01 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current 2011-11-14 15:07:06 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current 2011-11-14 15:07:08 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current 2011-11-14 15:07:20 : 0000000200000ED500000064 : xlog : copying 2011-11-14 15:07:24 : 0000000200000ED500000014 : xlog : copying 2011-11-14 15:07:39 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current 2011-11-14 15:07:45 : 0000000200000ED500000061 : xlog : copying 2011-11-14 15:08:01 : 0000000200000ED500000069 : xlog : too current Why on earth is it sending IN_CLOSE_WRITE messages for 0014, 1145, and 0061? Is that just old threads closing their old filehandles after they realize they can't write to that particular xlog? Either way, adding lsof or (ironically much faster pg_current_xlog_location) checking for the most recent xlog to ignore, I can "emulate" PG archive mode using an asynchronous background process. On another note, watching kernel file IO messages is quite fascinating. -- Shaun Thomas OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604 312-676-8870 sthomas@peak6.com ______________________________________________ See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: