Re: Disable OpenSSL compression
От | Jeroen Vermeulen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Disable OpenSSL compression |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4EB964DD.6030901@xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Disable OpenSSL compression ("Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Disable OpenSSL compression
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2011-11-08 22:59, Albe Laurenz wrote: > In addition to the oprofile data I collected three times: > - the duration as shown in the server log > - the duration as shown by \timing > - the duration of the psql command as measured by "time" [...] > I think this makes a good case for disabling compression. It's a few data points, but is it enough to make a good case? As I understand it, compression can save time not only on transport but also on the amount of data that needs to go through encryption -- probably depending on choice of cypher, hardware support, machine word width, compilation details etc. Would it make sense to run a wider experiment, e.g. in the buld farm? Another reason why I believe compression is often used with encryption is to maximize information content per byte of data: harder to guess, harder to crack. Would that matter? Jeroen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: