Re: To having or not to having?
От | Ferruccio Zamuner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: To having or not to having? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4EA49B58.9040602@diff.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | To having or not to having? (Ferruccio Zamuner <nonsolosoft@diff.org>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On 10/23/11 23:12, I wrote: > Hello, > > I'm rusty with SQL and I've started to practice it again but I'm falling > on this issue. I've found first solution using WINDOWING: SELECT d.pintime, d.a_id, d.c_id, d.value, d.id, d.sincedate, d.todate, d.description, d.genre FROM (SELECT pintime,a_id,c_id,value,id,sincedate,todate,description, genre, $1::date-a.sincedate as days, min($1::date-a.sincedate) over w AS "days 2" FROM b, a WHERE pintime BETWEEN $2 AND $2::interval+'00:01:00'::interval AND b.a_id=a.idAND a.genre='F' AND description ~*'35$' WINDOW W AS (partition by c_id) ORDER BY $1::date-a.sincedate ASC)AS d WHERE d.days=d."days 2" ORDER BY d.c_id; I'm sure that there are many other solutions and probably mine could be not the best. So I'm looking for more hint and suggestions. Thank you again. \ferz
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: