Re: SET variable - Permission issues
| От | Joe Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SET variable - Permission issues |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4E949199.8030809@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: SET variable - Permission issues ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/11/2011 11:53 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> Is this a TODO? We might not want to make work_mem SUSET, but it >> would allow administrators to control this. > > Well, we've identified a few people who like the idea, but I'm not > sure we have the degree of consensus we normally look for before > putting something on the TODO list. That's pretty much what I was thinking. > After the discussion on this thread, are there still any *objections* > to allowing bounds or subsets to be SUSET to limit GUC values more > strictly than the limits hard-coded in C? No objections here. Joe -- Joe Conway credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: