Re: Adding more memory = hugh cpu load

Em 10-10-2011 14:46, Kevin Grittner escreveu:
> alexandre - aldeia digital<adaldeia@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> Notice that we have no idle % in cpu column.
>
> So they're making full use of all the CPUs they paid for.  That in
> itself isn't a problem.  Unfortunately you haven't given us nearly
> enough information to know whether there is indeed a problem, or if
> so, what.  What was throughput before?  What is it now?  How has
> latency been affected?  And all those unanswered questions from my
> first email....
>
> The problem *might* be something along the lines of most of the
> discussion on the thread.  It might not be.  I just don't know yet,
> myself.

 From the point of view of the client, the question is simple: until the
last friday (with 16 GB of RAM), the load average of server rarely
surpasses 4. Nothing change in normal database use.

Tonight, we will remove the extra memory. :/

Best regards.