Re: index bloat on partial index 8.4
От | Kevin Ricords |
---|---|
Тема | Re: index bloat on partial index 8.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E8B5030.7090902@silverback.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: index bloat on partial index 8.4 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: index bloat on partial index 8.4
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Thank you for your response. I believe I misunderstood "reclaimed for re-use". Using contrib/pg_freespace, I see empty index pages can be reused elsewhere in the same index, but are not deallocated. To keep my index at the size I expected, I will have to vacuum more frequently or reindex/rebuild regularly. -Kevin On 10/3/2011 11:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Kevin Ricords<kevin@silverback.com> writes: >> My implementation is a 150 million row table with a partial index on >> newly created rows, where every row will be updated to not match the >> index condition every few minutes. >> The index size appears to grow proportional to the number of rows added >> to the table, but doesn't shrink when rows are updated to no longer meet >> the partial index condition. > Well, a btree index is basically never going to shrink, short of a > rebuild (REINDEX). The right administrative goal is to prevent it from > growing. The key issues you need to deal with are (1) making sure it > gets vacuumed often enough; (2) making sure there are not long-lived > transactions that prevent VACUUM from removing recently-dead tuples. > You've not really provided enough data for anyone to guess whether the > problem is (1) or (2) or both. What's the vacuuming configuration on > your installation? Have you checked for applications failing to close > their transactions? > > regards, tom lane > . >
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: