Re: Temporary tables and in-memory use
От | Marios Vodas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Temporary tables and in-memory use |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E84AB2E.7040807@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Temporary tables and in-memory use (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you. The setup is intended for one user environment for complex queries and operations that's why I wrote 2GB temp_buffers! Thank you again, I really appreciate it. Marios On 29/9/2011 7:55 μμ, Tom Lane wrote: > Marios Vodas<mvodas@gmail.com> writes: >> If I'm not wrong, temporary tables stay in memory if they do not go over >> temp_buffers limit (e.g. if temp_buffers is 2GB and the size of the table is >> 300MB the table will remain in memory). >> What if a column is variable length (e.g. text), how does this column stay >> in-memory since it should be stored in TOAST? > Well, the toast table is also temp, so it'll get cached in temp_buffers > as well, as long as it fits. > >> When I build a GiST index on a temporary table does the index stay in memory >> as well? > Same answer. > > Keep in mind that temp_buffers is per process, not global. Just as with > work_mem, you need to be careful about setting it sky-high. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: