Re: pgAgent crashes on failed connection
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgAgent crashes on failed connection |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E83844C.2060607@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgAgent crashes on failed connection (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgAgent crashes on failed connection
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On 28.09.2011 20:24, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> (sorry for the late reply, this fell through the cracks..) >> >> On 10.08.2011 11:48, Dave Page wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Merlin Moncure<mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Heikki Linnakangas >>>> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I created 100 identical pgagent jobs, with one step that simply does >>>>> "SELECT >>>>> pg_sleep(10)". I then forced them all to run immediately, with "UPDATE >>>>> pgagent.pga_job SET jobnextrun=now();". pgagent crashed. >>>>> >>>>> What happened is that the when all those jobs are launched at the same >>>>> time, >>>>> the server ran into the max_connections limit, and pgagent didn't handle >>>>> that too well. JobThread::JobThread constructor does not check for NULL >>>>> result from DBConn::Get(), and passes a NULL connection to Job::Job, >>>>> which >>>>> tries to reference it, leading to a segfault. >>>>> >>>>> I propose the attached patch. >>>> >>>> hm, in the event that happens, is that logged in the client somehow? >>>> wouldn't you want to throw an exception or something like that? >>> >>> I think the most straightforward way to handle this is to dump an >>> error into pgagent.pga_joblog when deleting the thread. Might be a >>> little ugly to pass the original error message back rather than a >>> generic one though. Can you take a look Heikki? >> >> You mean something like the attached? Works for me, but inserting an entry >> in joblog for each failed attempt might create a lot of entries there, if >> the problem persists. > > Is it correct behavior to throw unhandled sql exception if the logging > query fails? Sorry, I didn't understand that. I don't see any exceptions been thrown. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: