Re: Speed of lo_unlink vs. DELETE on BYTEA
От | Reuven M. Lerner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speed of lo_unlink vs. DELETE on BYTEA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E7C8A4B.9070609@lerner.co.il обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Speed of lo_unlink vs. DELETE on BYTEA ("Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
body p { margin-bottom: 10pt; margin-top: 0pt; } <body style="direction: ltr;" bidimailui-detected-decoding-type="UTF-8" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Hi, everyone. Albe wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2049FCE78@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at" type="cite"> Could you try with a trigger instead of a rule and see if the performance is better? Yours, Laurenz Albe Great idea. I did that, and here are the results for 10,000 records: |                          | Delete   | Dump     | |---------------------------+-----------+-----------| | Empty content            | 8.162s   | 0.064s   | | bytea                    | 1m0.417s | 0.157s   | | large object with rule   | 4m44.501s | 1m38.454s | | large object with trigger | 7m42.208s | 1m48.369s | Ideas, anyone? Reuven -- Reuven M. Lerner -- Web development, consulting, and training Mobile: +972-54-496-8405 * US phone: 847-230-9795 Skype/AIM: reuvenlerner
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: