Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E798974.8030801@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 21.09.2011 02:53, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > C stdlib quick-sort time elapsed: 2.092451 seconds > Inline quick-sort time elapsed: 1.587651 seconds > > Does *that* look attractive to you? Not really, to be honest. That's a 25% speedup in pure qsorting speed. How much of a gain in a real query do you expect to get from that, in the best case? There's so many other sources of overhead that I'm afraid this will be lost in the noise. If you find a query that spends, say, 50% of its time in qsort(), you will only get a 12.5% speedup on that query. And even 50% is really pushing it - I challenge you to find a query that spends any significant amount of time qsorting integers. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: