Re: Allow sorts to use more available memory
От | Robert Schnabel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Allow sorts to use more available memory |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E6E830E.30701@missouri.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Allow sorts to use more available memory (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Allow sorts to use more available memory
Re: Allow sorts to use more available memory Re: Allow sorts to use more available memory |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 9/12/2011 3:58 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Robert Schnabel > <schnabelr@missouri.edu> wrote: >> The recent "data warehouse" thread made me think about how I use work_mem >> for some of my big queries. So I tried SET work_mem = '4GB' for a session >> and got >> >> ERROR: 4194304 is outside the valid range for parameter "work_mem" (64 .. >> 2097151) > Ubuntu 10.10, pgsql 8.4.8: > > smarlowe=# set work_mem='1000GB'; > SET Ok, so is this a limitation related to the Windows implementation? And getting back to the to-do list entry and reading the related posts, it appears that even if you could set work_mem that high it would only use 2GB anyway. I guess that was the second part of my question. Is that true?
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: