Re: superusers are members of all roles?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: superusers are members of all roles? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E6D7CB7.3060200@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: superusers are members of all roles? (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: superusers are members of all roles?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/11/2011 10:32 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Andrew Dunstan (andrew@dunslane.net) wrote: >>> Address problem where superusers are assumed to be members of all groups >>> >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00337.php >> This turns out to be a one-liner. > I really don't know that I agree with removing this, to be honest.. I > haven't got time at the moment to really discuss it, but at the very > least, not being able to 'set role' to any user when postgres would be > REALLY annoying.. > > It's NOT changing that. All this affects is how +groupname is treated in pg_hba.conf, i.e. do we treat every superuser there as being a member of every group. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: