Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB
От | Andy Colson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E6CC769.10604@squeakycode.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB (Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 09/11/2011 09:21 AM, Igor Chudov wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com <mailto:klaussfreire@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com <mailto:ichudov@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Well, right now, my server has twelve 7,200 RPM 2TB hard drives in a RAID-6 > > configuration. > > They are managed by a 3WARE 9750 RAID CARD. > > > > I would say that I am not very concerned with linear relationship of read > > speed to disk speed. If that stuff is somewhat slow, it is OK with me. > > With Raid 6 you'll have abysmal performance on write operations. > In data warehousing, there's lots of writes to temporary files, for > sorting and stuff like that. > > You should either migrate to raid 10, or set up a separate array for > temporary files, perhaps raid 0. > > > Thanks. I will rebuild the RAID array early next week and I will see if I have a Raid 10 option with that card. > > Quantitatively, what would you say is the write speed difference between RAID 10 and RAID 6? > Note that using RAID 10, while faster, cuts your usable space in half. 12 2TB drives in raid 10 == 6 drives * 2TB == 12 TBtotal space. That's not big enough, is it? -Andy
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: