On 08.09.2011 23:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>>> Maybe we need to include math.h. And while we're about it, should the
>>> result of round() be cast to an int, since that's what the function
>>> returns?
>
>> Or use rint(), which we certainly have.
>
> Yeah, this broke the build on my old HPUX box too. I committed a quick
> fix using rint(),
Thanks!
> but on reflection I wonder if it shouldn't be ceil().
Doesn't really matter. The exact value of that parameter isn't critical
to the algorithm, and it can't go down to 0.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com