Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E5EA756.1090703@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/31/2011 04:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> >>> Well, the Unix approach is to use tools that do one thing well to build up more complex tools. Making pg_dump run someexternal command to inject things into the stream seems like the wrong thing given this philosophy. Use pg_dump to getthe bits you want (pre-data, post-data) and sandwich them around whatever else you want. >> I agree... except for one little niggling concern: If pg_dump is injecting something, then the DDL is being grabbed witha single, consistent snapshot. --pre and --post do not get you that (though we could probably use the new ability toexport snapshots to fix that...) > Eh, --pre and --post are pg_restore flags, so you already have a > consistent snapshot. > We've been talking about adding them for pg_dump too. I take Jim's point about the snapshot, but I still don't feel it's a good reason to allow some arbitrary code or script to be run between them (and after all, it's not likely to run with the same snapshot anyway). cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: