Re: rename index fields bug
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: rename index fields bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E5E5228.3040707@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | rename index fields bug (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: rename index fields bug
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 31.08.2011 18:20, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I've just stumbled across this, which appears to be a regression from > 8.4 that is present in 9.0 and master: > > andrew=# create table foo (x int primary key); > NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index > "foo_pkey" for table "foo" > CREATE TABLE > andrew=# alter table foo rename x to y; > ALTER TABLE > andrew=# select attname from pg_attribute where attrelid = > 'foo_pkey'::regclass; > attname > --------- > x > (1 row) > > In 8.4 the index attribute is renamed correctly. That was intentional: commit c176e122222c63844c0a2f3f8c568c3fe6c57d15 Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed Dec 23 16:43:43 2009 +0000 Remove code that attempted to rename index columns to keep them in sync with their underlying table columns. That code was not bright enough to cope with collision situations (ie, new name conflicts with some other column of the index). Since there is no functional reason to do this at all, trying to upgrade the logic to be bulletproof doesn't seem worth the trouble. This change means that both the index name and the column names of an index are set when it's created, and won't be automatically changed when the underlying table columns are renamed. Neatnik DBAs are still free to rename them manually, of course. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: