Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E4CBA47.5070600@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ (Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 18/08/11 17:35, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 18/08/2011 11:48 AM, Ogden wrote: >> Isn't this very dangerous? I have the Dell PERC H700 card - I see >> that it has 512Mb Cache. Is this the same thing and good enough to >> switch to nobarrier? Just worried if a sudden power shut down, then >> data can be lost on this option. >> >> > Yeah, I'm confused by that too. Shouldn't a write barrier flush data > to persistent storage - in this case, the RAID card's battery backed > cache? Why would it force a RAID controller cache flush to disk, too? > > If the card's cache has a battery, then the cache is preserved in the advent of crash/power loss etc - provided it has enough charge, so setting 'writeback' property on arrays is safe. The PERC/SERVERRAID cards I'm familiar (LSI Megaraid rebranded models) all switch to write-though mode if they detect the battery is dangerously discharged so this is not normally a problem (but commit/fsync performance will fall off a cliff when this happens)! Cheers Mark
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: