Re: rc1 or beta4?
От | Dave Byrne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: rc1 or beta4? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E4BF9A4.7070600@mdb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: rc1 or beta4? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: rc1 or beta4?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/17/2011 09:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > I think you're imagining a lot more structure than actually exists in > this project ;-). Anybody can edit that page, and there's no necessary > consequence of something being written there. It's just notes to help > us keep track of issues, not something graven on stone tablets. > > The pg_upgrade thing is listed as a beta blocker because I put it there > --- but that's just my opinion. If it had proven hard to fix we might > have concluded that we wouldn't let it block a beta release. > > If the plpython thing is a new crash that didn't exist before 9.1, > my feeling is that it's a blocker. > > regards, tom lane > I can confirm that the bug in pg_upgrade has been fixed with Bruce's patch in commit 2411fbdac448045a23eebf4f0dbfd5790ebad720 Thanks Dave Byrne
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: