Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server
От | Andy Colson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E4BC51A.2080503@squeakycode.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Tuning Tips for a new Server (Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 8/16/2011 8:35 PM, Ogden wrote: > Hope all is well. I have received tremendous help from this list prior and therefore wanted some more advice. > > I bought some new servers and instead of RAID 5 (which I think greatly hindered our writing performance), I configured6 SCSI 15K drives with RAID 10. This is dedicated to /var/lib/pgsql. The main OS has 2 SCSI 15K drives on a differentvirtual disk and also Raid 10, a total of 146Gb. I was thinking of putting Postgres' xlog directory on the OS virtualdrive. Does this even make sense to do? > > The system memory is 64GB and the CPUs are dual Intel E5645 chips (they are 6-core each). > > It is a dedicated PostgreSQL box and needs to support heavy read and moderately heavy writes. > > Currently, I have this for the current system which as 16Gb Ram: > > max_connections = 350 > > work_mem = 32MB > maintenance_work_mem = 512MB > wal_buffers = 640kB > > # This is what I was helped with before and made reporting queries blaze by > seq_page_cost = 1.0 > random_page_cost = 3.0 > cpu_tuple_cost = 0.5 > effective_cache_size = 8192MB > > Any help and input is greatly appreciated. > > Thank you > > Ogden What seems to be the problem? I mean, if nothing is broke, then don't fix it :-) You say reporting query's are fast, and the disk's should take care of your slow write problem from before. (Did you test the write performance?) So, whats wrong? -Andy
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: