Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends
От | Steve Singer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E4941B7.9080304@ca.afilias.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11-08-15 10:00 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > > Without commenting on what should be done in your specific case, I > wonder whether it's time to fully retire the deprecated double > representation of timestamps. Is anyone actually expected to rely on > their availability when 9.2 is released? This also caused difficulties > for Johann Oskarsson recently, during work on PL/Java. This would mean that anyone using the floating point timestamps today won't be able to use pg_upgrade to upgrade to whichever version we remove them from. 8.3 had float based timestamps as the default and I suspect many installations with the default 8.3 settings have been upgraded via pg_upgrade to 9.0 built the old timestamps representation. Steve
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: