Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E42D5A9.2040008@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10.08.2011 21:45, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On ons, 2011-08-10 at 14:26 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >>> It's come up before: >>> <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg01293.php> >> >> I was about to wonder out loud if we might be trying to hit a moving target.... > > I think we are dealing with a lot more moving targets than adding a new > version of SHA every 12 to 15 years. Moving to a something more modern for internal use is one thing. But regarding the user-visible md5() function, how about we jump off this treadmill and remove it altogether? And provide a backwards-compatible function in pgcrypto. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: