Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API
От | Anssi Kääriäinen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E3FC2ED.10406@thl.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Transient plans versus the SPI API (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/08/2011 01:07 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote: > That is why I think it is best done in the main parser - it has to parse > and analyse the query anyway and likely knows which constants are > "arguments" to the query As far as I understand the problem, the parsing must transform table references to schema-qualified references. The table_foobar in "SELECT * FROM table_foobar WHERE id = ?" is not enough to identify a table. Using search_path, query_str as a key is one possibility, but the search_path is likely to be different for each user, and this could result in the same query being cached multiple times. By the way, I checked current Git HEAD and pg_stat_statements seems to not handle search_path correctly. For pg_stat_statements this is not critical, but if the raw query string is used as plan cache key things will obviously break... - Anssi
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: