Re: BBU still needed with SSD?
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BBU still needed with SSD? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E239ABC.4020204@postnewspapers.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BBU still needed with SSD? (Andy <angelflow@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BBU still needed with SSD?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 18/07/2011 9:43 AM, Andy wrote: > Hi, > > Is BBU still needed with SSD? You *need* an SSD with a supercapacitor or on-board battery backup for its cache. Otherwise you *will* lose data. Consumer SSDs are like a hard disk attached to a RAID controller with write-back caching enabled and no BBU. In other words: designed to eat your data. > In this case is BBU still needed? If I put 2 SSD in software RAID 1, would that be any slower than 2 SSD in HW RAID 1 withBBU? What are the pros and cons? > You don't need write-back caching for fsync() performance if your SSDs have big enough caches. I don't know enough to say whether there are other benefits to having them on a BBU HW raid controller or whether SW RAID is fine. POST Newspapers 276 Onslow Rd, Shenton Park Ph: 08 9381 3088 Fax: 08 9388 2258 ABN: 50 008 917 717 http://www.postnewspapers.com.au/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: