Re: SSI atomic commit

On 08.07.2011 00:21, Dan Ports wrote:
> We should also apply the attached patch, which corrects a minor issue
> with the conditions for flagging transactions that could potentially
> make a snapshot unsafe.
>
> There's a small window wherein a transaction is committed but not yet
> on the finished list, and we shouldn't flag it as a potential conflict
> if so. We can also skip adding a doomed transaction to the list of
> possible conflicts because we know it won't commit.

Hmm, it's now also possible for the transaction to be prepared, and 
already visible to others, but not yet flagged as committed. Shouldn't 
those be included too?

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com