Re: Wrong statistics for overloaded functions
От | Erwin Brandstetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wrong statistics for overloaded functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E15A1D4.2070506@falter.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wrong statistics for overloaded functions (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Wrong statistics for overloaded functions
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On 07.07.2011 08:52, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 21:22 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote: >> Aloha! >> >> I have been observing irregularities in the function statistics for some time. Now I have investigated and believe tohave found the cause. >> Everything is here, including a proposed fix: >> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/325 >> > The fix you propose requires from us to write a patch for PostgreSQL > (which won't be available to users before 9.2) for something we can > already do right into pgAdmin. Instead of filtering with the name of the > schema and the function, we should use its OID. This way, we could fix > 1.12, and 1.14 really quickly. Yeah, that's even better. Makes the query simpler, too. I was unsure whether funcid was known at the time of the query. I do wonder, however, why the function arguments, part of the function signature, would not be included in pg_catalog.pg_stat_user_functions. Would you think this is worthy of a suggestion to the postgres people? Regards Erwin
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: