Re: BUG #6092: specific casting required for gist indexing of bigint
От | Jeff Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #6092: specific casting required for gist indexing of bigint |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E149801.40507@pgexperts.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #6092: specific casting required for gist indexing of bigint (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #6092: specific casting required for gist indexing of bigint
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 07/05/11 17:06, Tom Lane wrote: > "Jeff Frost" <jeff@pgexperts.com> writes: >> Ran into a situation with a customer who is using the btree_gist contrib >> module to allow combined index of some tsearch data and two other columns. >> One of these other columns is a bigint field. I noticed that the combined >> index won't be used by the planner unless you specifically cast the bare >> number to a bigint. > If memory serves, the btree_gist opclasses don't include any cross-type > operators, so "int8 = int4" doesn't work here. > Ah! And if you look at the contrib/btree_gist/sql/int8.sql test file, you'll see this: SELECT count(*) FROM int8tmp WHERE a < 464571291354841::int8; So, I'd say it's expected behavior even though it's slightly counter intuitive if you're used to the auto typing behavior.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: