Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E09EDA6.1000601@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/28/2011 10:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander<magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> We discussed earlier to potentially block the creation, and removal, >> of branches on the origin server, to prevent mistakes like this. It >> has only happened once in almost a year, so it's probably not >> necessary - but I wanted to raise the option anyway in case people >> forgot about it. >> The downside would be that in order to create or drop a branch *when >> intended* a committer would need someone from the infrastructure team >> to temporarily switch off the branch-blocking setting, and then back >> on.. > I think it would be sensible to block branch removal, as there's > basically never a scenario where we'd do that during current usage. > I'm not excited about blocking branch addition, although I worry > sooner or later somebody will accidentally push a private development > branch :-(. Is it possible to block only removal and not addition? > > +1. Spurious branch addition shouldn't cause us much pain - we'd just remove the new branch. Unwanted deletion is more disruptive. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: