Re: POSIX question
От | Markus Wanner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: POSIX question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4E073E65.8080805@bluegap.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | POSIX question (Radosław Smogura <rsmogura@softperience.eu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Radek, On 06/20/2011 03:27 PM, Radosław Smogura wrote: > When playing with mmap I done some approach how to deal with growing > files, so... Your approach seems to require a SysV alloc (for nattach) as well as POSIX shmem and/or mmap. Adding requirements for these syscalls certainly needs to give a good benefit for Postgres, as they presumably pose portability issues. > 3. a. Lock header when adding chunks (1st chunk is header) (we don't > want concurrent chunk allocation) Sure we don't? There are at least a dozen memory allocators for multi-threaded applications, all trying to optimize for concurrency. The programmer of a multi-threaded application doesn't need to care much about concurrent allocations. He can allocate (and free) quite a lot of tiny chunks concurrently from shared memory. Regards Markus Wanner
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: