Re: generating a large XML document

2011.06.20 10:58, Pavel Stehule rašė:
> string_agg is more effective now. The solution is only radical
> refactoring of xmlagg function.
Thank you, Pavel for letting me know of string_agg.

explain analyze
SELECT
     string_agg(
       XMLELEMENT ( NAME "bar",
         XMLELEMENT ( NAME "code", tick_barcode),
         XMLELEMENT ( NAME "stat", status),
         CASE WHEN type IS NOT NULL THEN XMLELEMENT ( NAME "tip", type)
ELSE NULL END,
         CASE WHEN sec_name IS NOT NULL THEN XMLELEMENT ( NAME "sec",
sec_name) ELSE NULL END,
         CASE WHEN row_name IS NOT NULL THEN XMLELEMENT ( NAME "row",
row_name) ELSE NULL END,
         CASE WHEN seat_name IS NOT NULL THEN XMLELEMENT ( NAME "plc",
seat_name) ELSE NULL END,
         CASE WHEN substr(tick_barcode,length(tick_barcode),1)= '1' THEN
         XMLELEMENT ( NAME "groups",
             XMLELEMENT ( NAME "group", 1)
            )
         ELSE NULL END
        )::text, NULL
     )::xml
     FROM tex.fnk_access_control_tickets(8560, 0);

"Aggregate  (cost=12.75..12.77 rows=1 width=238) (actual
time=1025.502..1025.502 rows=1 loops=1)"
"  ->  Function Scan on fnk_access_control_tickets  (cost=0.25..10.25
rows=1000 width=238) (actual time=495.703..503.999 rows=16292 loops=1)"
"Total runtime: 1036.775 ms"

Its over 10 times faster than using xmlagg.

--
Julius Tuskenis
Programavimo skyriaus vadovas
UAB nSoft
mob. +37068233050